Skip to main content

Portraits of Christ: John’s Gospel, part 2

In John’s Gospel we have an emphasis on Jesus that is unique compared to the other gospels. John not only emphasizes his deity, but his mysteriousness. The reader is left with an impression of Jesus as a mystical teacher, in the sense that his words and actions are not only those of a profound religious teacher, but of one who is other-worldly. So often in this gospel we read of Jesus making statements that the crowds, the religious teachers, and even his own disciples sometimes could not fathom.

For starters, there are the “I am” statements (e.g., I am the bread of life; I am the living water; I am the good shepherd; I am the way, the truth, and the life), which were clearly claims to divinity, for these statements in the Jewish context referred to God’s title “I am,” given when Moses inquired of his name at the burning bush. Jesus makes much use of mystical metaphors like these and others, like all the ‘day’ and ‘night’ references in this book, which portrays him as mystical or mysterious sounding.

Jesus then makes some statements that are paradoxical, turning traditional religious language on his head. For example, he told Nicodemus that one must be born again to enter the kingdom of heaven, which left poor Nicodemus confused. While such expressions were novel at the time, they might make some sense to a religious person who has had some genuine personal encounter with God. Nicodemus’ lack of understanding is meant to show that he hadn’t, for he could not make any sense of Jesus’ metaphors. And we thus see that the religious teachers of that day as a whole did not really know or understand God.

Then there are statements from Jesus that are just enigmatic. For example, he proclaimed that one must eat his flesh and drink his blood to enter the kingdom of heaven - scandalous sounding to pious Jewish listeners who would avoid blood or unkosher food or dead bodies. He talks about God being his Father, or the kingdom, or what will happen when he goes to Jerusalem, but often in cryptic language. Even up to his last days before his crucifixion, the disciples cannot make sense of his enigmatic statements about where he is going.

Throughout the entire book, John repeatedly emphasizes how mysterious Jesus is, and how mystical he seems. This emphasizes his holiness, which means not only moral perfection, but ‘holy’ at its heart means ‘completely different from us or the world.’ He is not only on a completely different level morally, but in his essence, his personality, his nature, and his wisdom, for he is God. The other gospels emphasize his humanity, which we must embrace more than we have been willing to, but we must embrace his divinity in the full sense that John wishes to convey - that he is so different and beyond our understanding, that we are to respond with a sense of awe and wonder, as well as love, for who Jesus is.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mystical & charismatic Christianity

As a person with charismatic leanings, I have come to prefer Catholic / Anglican / Episcopal forms of charismatic Christianity. As mentioned in my last post, charismatic Catholicism goes way back to the early church, under the rubric of Christian mysticism. The reason I prefer these forms is because they are more balanced. Protestant charismatics and Pentecostals greatly overemphasize things like speaking in tongues, which are really a minor gift. Tongues have been practiced throughout church history, and there is no historical or scriptural basis for the claim that tongues and other charismatic gifts ever ceased*. But they have never been considered "a big deal" or in any way a sign that a person is more spiritual than another who doesn't do tongues or such gifts. Only with the advent of modern charismatic movements did such an extreme emphasis get put on tongues and charismatic gifts. St. Paul commanded us to desire the better gifts - in that context, he was referring t...

Evangelicalism's gradual demise

The term "evangelical" was popularized by Martin Luther ("evangelisch" in German), which meant a follower of the gospel. The term was originally a very good and useful term, as it referred to someone who believed in a religion based on faith and following the teachings of Christ, rather than man-made religious rules. It was meaningful enough but also broad enough to encompass a general theological orientation and religious lifestyle. It could include and accommodate somewhat different views or interpretations of Christian belief, including those who focused more on the grace, spirituality and lifestyle of Christ. As such, it was not the exclusive property of one religious group or theological orientation. The meaning has been generally positive in modern church history. However, in recent decades the term has been hijacked by fundamentalists who insist on a narrow interpretation of the term, insisting on a set of specific theological beliefs, while ignoring the C...

Apologetics site

A good scriptural apologetics site I found recently is www.christian-thinktank.com , which provides explanations for difficult biblical passages and issues. I can't vouch for everything yet, but one article I liked gives a good explanation for the ordered attacks and killings of Canaanites and Amalekites in the Old Testament, and similar OT controversies.