Skip to main content

Mysticism and charismatic Christianity

As I've read about church history in the past year, I've come to learn about mystical traditions that have been an essential part of the history of Christian practice. What we call mysticism refers first of all to proper, biblical forms of mysticism, which generally correspond to charismatic Catholicism (and related movements in other churches) in more modern terminology. It may also refer to some types of theology and practice that can be aberrant, speculative, and heterodox, which tends to give mysticism a bad name. But 'mysticism' should be understood primarily according to "mainstream mysticism".

Mysticism is essentially a lifestyle and theology of direct, personal experience with God, and thus, is emotional, passionate, and engages the person intellectually, spiritually, and emotionally. It is grounded on a biblical understanding of the fear of God and the love of God, and thus, mystics approach God as a Being to be held in great awe and respect, yet one who reveals himself to us, whose love we can know. This is in contrast to more mechanical, intellectual approaches to worship, and rationalistic approaches to theology (actually, religious rationalism), especially in the Protestant traditions.

A mystic is one who seeks to experience God's presence and love in a real way, thru the Word, prayer, and filling of the Spirit, such that one can experience God in a way that is just as real, if not more real, than experiencing the love of a romantic partner or friend. Worship and prayer are very emotional and passionate, and the worshiper seeks to be united with God in a real and meaningful way, like a person being romantically and physically being united with a spouse. This finds its basis in the lives and prayers of saints in the Bible, such as the prayers of the psalms, the lives of the saints, and New Testament passages about intimacy with God. For example, in 1 Cor. 6:17 St. Paul says, "But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit", and this is said in the context of sexuality and sensuality. Instead of uniting ourselves sinfully, we are to be united with Christ, alluding to the intimacy of marriage and being made "one flesh". This recognizes that God is far different than us, as he is transcendent and holy, and we could never be united with him in essence (only a heretic would claim that), but united spiritually within us.

This kind of spirituality has been practiced since the early church, and is reflected in the lives and writings of the saints - theologians and devotional writers - such as St. Augustine, St. Theresa, St. John Delecroix (St. John of the Cross), and even the Lutheran writer Kierkegaard - writers that I was first introduced to thru a book of devotional classics from my wife's aunt's class at Trinity Seminary. However, Protestant traditions (except Anglicans) have typically rejected this, due to the influence of western rationalism, and have tended much more toward religious rationalism and intellectual, rational, non-emotional expressions of Christianity. Hence their reaction against the charismatic and Pentecostal movements. These are essentially fundamentalist and Protestant evangelical forms of mysticism, with an emphasis on the experiential, emotional, and practical aspects of faith, in directly experiencing God and the filling of his Spirit. But these movements have also been rife with abuses. Later I'll talk more about possible abuses of mysticism.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gossip, accusation and spiritual warfare

Paul once wrote to the Corinthians, “For I am afraid that when I come I may not find you as I want you to be, and you may not find me as you want me to be. I fear that there may be quarreling, jealousy, outbursts of anger, factions, slander, gossip, arrogance and disorder” [1 Cor. 12:20]. Gossip is diagnosed as a serious spiritual problem, not a harmless form of conversation and social entertainment, as many in the secular world would view it.God views it differently. Gossip is the opposite of the love and grace that God wants to display in our lives.
Gossip is often exaggerated (and thus, untrue), or outright fabricated. Even church people engage in gossip in a seemingly sanctimonious guise (“We really ought to pray for X – you wouldn’t believe what he told me yesterday!...”). Whether secular or “christianized,” gossip betrays trust. “A gossip betrays a confidence, but a trustworthy man keeps a secret” [Prov. 11:13]; “A perverse person stirs up dissension, and a gossip separates clo…

Book review: Green Eggs and Ham (Dr. Seuss)

Green eggs and ham, as a recolorized staple breakfast food, captures the reader's attention by turning this diurnal sustenance into an unexpected and apparently unappetizing foodstuff. It thus symbolizes the existential angst of modern life, wherein we are unfulfilled by modern life, and are repelled by something that might impart nourishment. The "protagonist" to be convinced of its desirability remains anonymous, while the other actor refers to himself with an emphatic identifier "Sam I am", formed with a pronominal subject and copular verb of existence. This character thus seeks to emphasize his existence and existential wholeness, and even establish a sense of self-existence, with an apparent Old Testament allusion to Elohim speaking to Moses as the "I Am". This emphatic personal identifier thus introduces a prominent theme of religious existentialism to the narrative, probably more in line with original Kierkegaardian religious existentialism, ra…

Portraits of Christ: John’s Gospel, part 2

In John’s Gospel we have an emphasis on Jesus that is unique compared to the other gospels. John not only emphasizes his deity, but his mysteriousness. The reader is left with an impression of Jesus as a mystical teacher, in the sense that his words and actions are not only those of a profound religious teacher, but of one who is other-worldly. So often in this gospel we read of Jesus making statements that the crowds, the religious teachers, and even his own disciples sometimes could not fathom.

For starters, there are the “I am” statements (e.g., I am the bread of life; I am the living water; I am the good shepherd; I am the way, the truth, and the life), which were clearly claims to divinity, for these statements in the Jewish context referred to God’s title “I am,” given when Moses inquired of his name at the burning bush. Jesus makes much use of mystical metaphors like these and others, like all the ‘day’ and ‘night’ references in this book, which portrays him as mystical or mys…