Skip to main content

God is...

God is God. There are no words to describe or define him adequately. There is no way our minds can comprehend him, no way our natural minds can grasp him. His ways are not our ways. He exists outside the cosmos, i.e., he is transcendent, as the cosmos is merely his creation. He exists in a sense that we cannot understand; it is not any sort of existence that we can understand. For instance, his existence and essence are infinite, and he is self-existent. We can only grasp whatever exists in a temporal sense - that which begins at some point, is created, and ceases to exist (only the human soul does not cease).

But God justs exists. Infinitely. We cannot wrap our minds around that. We can sort of imagine our souls not ceasing to exist, living forever into the future, because we haven't died yet. But can you imagine existing without having ever been born, without ever having a beginning? Of course not; it blows your mind. But that's how God is. We cannot grasp his existence or essence, which are infinite, perfect, holy, entirely beyond our understanding.

For us to claim to really understand God would be like an ant claiming to understand Einstein or quantum mechanics, or a roach claiming to understand chaos theory or Kant. We can only stand in awe and fear before this God who is nothing like us or anything in the cosmos.

We cannot know God by our natural minds. He is so far beyond us, beyond our knowledge and understanding. Thus, God should by nature seem irrelevant to us, just as an ant would find a Bach concerto or a quantum physics text irrelevant. And in our natural, unsaved state, we mostly do dismiss him as irrelevant. The only way that we finite creatures could know God would be if God made himself relevant to us, if he revealed himself to us. He made himself relevant, in that he made each of us with a "God shaped vacuum" inside, which only he can fill. And the Unknowable God made himself known to us, revealed himself to us, thru his Word, thru Christ who became one of us, and thru his Spirit, which draws us to Christ. Only by these means can we come to know him, in the sense of having a personal relationship with us. We can thus know him personally, and experience his presence and love, though we can never know him fully, as we are finite and he is infinite. We must recognize how limited we are as humans and as sinners, and can only stand before God in awe, wonder, and fear.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mystical & charismatic Christianity

As a person with charismatic leanings, I have come to prefer Catholic / Anglican / Episcopal forms of charismatic Christianity. As mentioned in my last post, charismatic Catholicism goes way back to the early church, under the rubric of Christian mysticism. The reason I prefer these forms is because they are more balanced. Protestant charismatics and Pentecostals greatly overemphasize things like speaking in tongues, which are really a minor gift. Tongues have been practiced throughout church history, and there is no historical or scriptural basis for the claim that tongues and other charismatic gifts ever ceased*. But they have never been considered "a big deal" or in any way a sign that a person is more spiritual than another who doesn't do tongues or such gifts. Only with the advent of modern charismatic movements did such an extreme emphasis get put on tongues and charismatic gifts. St. Paul commanded us to desire the better gifts - in that context, he was referring t...

Evangelicalism's gradual demise

The term "evangelical" was popularized by Martin Luther ("evangelisch" in German), which meant a follower of the gospel. The term was originally a very good and useful term, as it referred to someone who believed in a religion based on faith and following the teachings of Christ, rather than man-made religious rules. It was meaningful enough but also broad enough to encompass a general theological orientation and religious lifestyle. It could include and accommodate somewhat different views or interpretations of Christian belief, including those who focused more on the grace, spirituality and lifestyle of Christ. As such, it was not the exclusive property of one religious group or theological orientation. The meaning has been generally positive in modern church history. However, in recent decades the term has been hijacked by fundamentalists who insist on a narrow interpretation of the term, insisting on a set of specific theological beliefs, while ignoring the C...

Apologetics site

A good scriptural apologetics site I found recently is www.christian-thinktank.com , which provides explanations for difficult biblical passages and issues. I can't vouch for everything yet, but one article I liked gives a good explanation for the ordered attacks and killings of Canaanites and Amalekites in the Old Testament, and similar OT controversies.