Skip to main content

Jesus is...

Jesus is fully God and fully man, together*. That is a mystery that we cannot really grasp, another aspect of God of which we can only stand in awe and wonder.

As C.S. Lewis stated, there are only three options to Christ, three ways to respond: that he is Lord, a lunatic, or a liar. And that is how people in his day responded. At one point, his family came to take him - in that day, that meant to take him away, because they thought he was crazy, and some of the people thought he was crazy: "And when his family heard about it, they went out to seize him, for people were saying, 'He is beside himself [i.e., crazy]. He is possessed by Beelzebub'" (Mark 3:21). The Pharisees viewed him as a liar, accused him of blasphemy, and even attributed his powers to the devil. Clearly he claimed to be God, for that is why the religious leaders hated him and wanted to kill him; such was clearly stated at his trial. He claimed to be God, a fact that cannot be argued away. No sane human could claim to be God, but Jesus was no ordinary human. If one even intellectually assents that he is God, then that requires a real response; a merely intellectual faith is not an option. 'Lord' means lord over everything, including our lives, and that claim requires a response from you.

For saved Christians, that is part of the purpose of salvation. There's no cheap grace, no getting saved and retreating to a spiritual comfort zone or vacation mentality. "I'm saved, everything's cool, don't need to strain myself" is not an option. We are saved for the purpose of living under his lordship, of living as his disciples. That's a full-time calling.

In those days, a disciple meant a student, an apprentice of a rabbi. Jesus was a self-trained rabbi, and he calls us to be disciples. That's a full-time thing, not like a student in our modern sense (go to school a few hours a day and come home, like living as a Sunday-only Christian). It means spending all your time with your master, giving up everything to follow him, absorbing all this teaching and lifestyle, and learning to practice and teach it yourself.

* In the early days of Christianity, church fathers and theologians debated this a lot - whether he had two separate natures that remained dinstinct (diphysitism, as this view is known, and is common to Catholicism and Protestantism), one nature only - a full merging of the two (monophysitism, condemned as heterodoxy), or two closely mingled and combined natures (miaphysitism, of the Eastern Orthodox Church); and whether he had one combined will (monotheletism) or two - a still distinct human will and a divine will (ditheletism?). These issues still divide the three major branches of Christianity, though they are less important today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mystical & charismatic Christianity

As a person with charismatic leanings, I have come to prefer Catholic / Anglican / Episcopal forms of charismatic Christianity. As mentioned in my last post, charismatic Catholicism goes way back to the early church, under the rubric of Christian mysticism. The reason I prefer these forms is because they are more balanced. Protestant charismatics and Pentecostals greatly overemphasize things like speaking in tongues, which are really a minor gift. Tongues have been practiced throughout church history, and there is no historical or scriptural basis for the claim that tongues and other charismatic gifts ever ceased*. But they have never been considered "a big deal" or in any way a sign that a person is more spiritual than another who doesn't do tongues or such gifts. Only with the advent of modern charismatic movements did such an extreme emphasis get put on tongues and charismatic gifts. St. Paul commanded us to desire the better gifts - in that context, he was referring t...

Evangelicalism's gradual demise

The term "evangelical" was popularized by Martin Luther ("evangelisch" in German), which meant a follower of the gospel. The term was originally a very good and useful term, as it referred to someone who believed in a religion based on faith and following the teachings of Christ, rather than man-made religious rules. It was meaningful enough but also broad enough to encompass a general theological orientation and religious lifestyle. It could include and accommodate somewhat different views or interpretations of Christian belief, including those who focused more on the grace, spirituality and lifestyle of Christ. As such, it was not the exclusive property of one religious group or theological orientation. The meaning has been generally positive in modern church history. However, in recent decades the term has been hijacked by fundamentalists who insist on a narrow interpretation of the term, insisting on a set of specific theological beliefs, while ignoring the C...

Apologetics site

A good scriptural apologetics site I found recently is www.christian-thinktank.com , which provides explanations for difficult biblical passages and issues. I can't vouch for everything yet, but one article I liked gives a good explanation for the ordered attacks and killings of Canaanites and Amalekites in the Old Testament, and similar OT controversies.