Skip to main content

Worship styles

I find myself in the odd position of being quite fond of two very different styles of worship, and being in need of both for a balanced spiritual life - and I gladly defend both from their detractors.

For years I have been fond of contemporary worship, and find it very conducive for spiritual growth and real worship. Some criticize it for its subjective and emotional nature, but in fact that is its advantage, and why I defend it, as it offers something lacking in many forms of worship in traditional churches. Traditional church worship can be lifeless, and most of all, a hollow ritual, an expression of mere religious rationalism or ritualistic religion (but not necessarily; see below). It is objective to an unhealthy degree. You see, Christianity is about a personal, daily-life relationship with God that we are to experience in a real way. It's about a personal relationship with God, not just an intellectual relationship or intellectual religious experience. Modern worship brings that out. It allows one to develop that crucial aspect of Christian spirituality, to experience God in worship, to worship in a meaningful way. Engaging in contemporary worship was revolutionary for my spiritual life, making my walk with God more real, and helping me get away from cold, intellectual spirituality.

That subjective element is important. It's an essential part of Christian living. God commanded us to love him with all our heart, soul, and strength (Deut. 6). That means intellectually, mentally, and emotionally, with all our being. In particular, that's in the word 'strength', which in Hebrew ['odeka] means also 'passion, intensity, all, utterly'. Modern worship brings out that crucial, practical, relational, passionate aspect of worship and experiencing God that the Bible commands.

My problem, though, is with superficial worship, which can be done just as easily with modern or traditional worship, like going thru the motions, excessive emotionalism without substance, pretending, doing it as mere ritual. Another significant problem I see is in how some churches today are taking contemporary worship too far. For example, amps cranked up loud, three electric guitars, and harsh, loud music, rather than more conducive, pleasant contemporary music. That leads to excessive emotionalism, and an irreverent worship atmosphere, more like a hard rock rally than worship. I see this in some churches regularly or special services, even holiday services. And I think, what could be next? The worship team wearing studded leather and spandex? Give me a break. That's human emotionalism, it's not reverent or God-focused, and it's not worship.

Proper contemporary worship has benefited me greatly, and even helped me to better appreciate some traditional forms of worship. In fact, I now feel more of an appreciation and need for "high-church" liturgical, formal, traditional worship (e.g., Lutheran, Catholic, even Methodist). It is reverent and emphasizes the greatness, holiness, and other-worldliness of God, and puts us in our proper place. It teaches spiritual discipline, contemplation of God, reverence and fear of God. It emphasizes the eucharist / communion in a way that is more biblical. It provides things like memorized prayers and liturgies that teach us how to pray and respond to God. All in all, it is very Christ-centered, spiritually beneficial, and reverent. And I can certainly experience God and be emotional but also fearful and reverent in this kind of context, not unlike in contemporary worship.

All in all, I think both styles are important, and should be accorded importance and balance.

BTW, I've found some good sermons online in German from a new church in Hamburg: http://www.icf-network.de [Prädigten auf Deutsch von der ICF-Gemeinde, Hamburg; ein bißschen schwer zu verstehen, weil der Prädiger einen schweizerischen Akzent hat].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gossip, accusation and spiritual warfare

Paul once wrote to the Corinthians, “For I am afraid that when I come I may not find you as I want you to be, and you may not find me as you want me to be. I fear that there may be quarreling, jealousy, outbursts of anger, factions, slander, gossip, arrogance and disorder” [1 Cor. 12:20]. Gossip is diagnosed as a serious spiritual problem, not a harmless form of conversation and social entertainment, as many in the secular world would view it.God views it differently. Gossip is the opposite of the love and grace that God wants to display in our lives.
Gossip is often exaggerated (and thus, untrue), or outright fabricated. Even church people engage in gossip in a seemingly sanctimonious guise (“We really ought to pray for X – you wouldn’t believe what he told me yesterday!...”). Whether secular or “christianized,” gossip betrays trust. “A gossip betrays a confidence, but a trustworthy man keeps a secret” [Prov. 11:13]; “A perverse person stirs up dissension, and a gossip separates clo…

Book review: Green Eggs and Ham (Dr. Seuss)

Green eggs and ham, as a recolorized staple breakfast food, captures the reader's attention by turning this diurnal sustenance into an unexpected and apparently unappetizing foodstuff. It thus symbolizes the existential angst of modern life, wherein we are unfulfilled by modern life, and are repelled by something that might impart nourishment. The "protagonist" to be convinced of its desirability remains anonymous, while the other actor refers to himself with an emphatic identifier "Sam I am", formed with a pronominal subject and copular verb of existence. This character thus seeks to emphasize his existence and existential wholeness, and even establish a sense of self-existence, with an apparent Old Testament allusion to Elohim speaking to Moses as the "I Am". This emphatic personal identifier thus introduces a prominent theme of religious existentialism to the narrative, probably more in line with original Kierkegaardian religious existentialism, ra…

Portraits of Christ: John’s Gospel, part 2

In John’s Gospel we have an emphasis on Jesus that is unique compared to the other gospels. John not only emphasizes his deity, but his mysteriousness. The reader is left with an impression of Jesus as a mystical teacher, in the sense that his words and actions are not only those of a profound religious teacher, but of one who is other-worldly. So often in this gospel we read of Jesus making statements that the crowds, the religious teachers, and even his own disciples sometimes could not fathom.

For starters, there are the “I am” statements (e.g., I am the bread of life; I am the living water; I am the good shepherd; I am the way, the truth, and the life), which were clearly claims to divinity, for these statements in the Jewish context referred to God’s title “I am,” given when Moses inquired of his name at the burning bush. Jesus makes much use of mystical metaphors like these and others, like all the ‘day’ and ‘night’ references in this book, which portrays him as mystical or mys…